Thursday, October 03, 2013

Brenna Youngblood

Brenna Youngblood
Though October 26th
Honor Fraser

I didn’t think Terrence Mallick’s Tree of Life was boring, simply, because it contained a type of doorknob I remembered from my childhood. The knobs were thick metal ingots that fit into heavy solid doors (only the present seems to have hollow doors), and they had a hard, long rectangle pin that jutted from one side through the door and into the receiving end of the knob’s twin on the other side. They loosened through use, eventually making the entrances and exits of doors a shaky, uncertain affair. One day, the knob will fall off. Mallick had that knob in his movie. He had it in his childhood in Texas. It loosened in the movie as the rigidity of the characters blurred, as their petty rages and disputes came up against death. Time knocks a bit and a bit more until we find ourselves quite loose. I won’t convince you of this, but the doorknob was for Mallick as it is for me, a symbol of our relationship to the infinite, the weather of not knowing.

Could it be that certain works by Brenna Youngblood offer just such metaphysical reports from the softer sides of our memory? Youngblood’s work, when it’s good, is not expressive but coded and hidden, not proclaiming anything other than the lived-in nature of life. The quality works offer gardens now overgrown and long overstuffed garages, places where arguments have blown themselves out and yells have ceased to echo. Writers have and will continue to troll Youngblood’s young and taciturn biography for details that correspond to her materials and images, but I find those works that make this sort of pursuit easy usually rank among Youngblood’s least interesting efforts. She can be funny, random, a bit of a punk, but Youngblood is at her best when what she is addressing is out of view, something dark in the corner, something just off the stage. She reminds some of Betye Saar and Robert Rauschenberg, but I like her best when she is like Jasper Johns and Robert Gober. Sometimes the things that mean the most are only half remembered, and half remembered things are what pluck our silver coated memories out of desire and into reality.

To get into what I mean, Youngblood’s work last year in Galerie Nathalie Obadia, Reclaimed Wood Floor, 2012 (Above), bears a look. It’s literally a floor, painted over with scattershot paint and atmospheric brushwork. It’s used and worn out. It could be the studio floor of a painter (which would be boring). In Youngblood’s hands, however, there are flavors and subtexts to this floor. When on the wall, it is nothing less than a J.M.W. Turner landscape, complete with winds and fires bleeding into and polluting the sky, opening up large and subsequently dwarfing any small human dramas held within. Youngblood conjures Turner’s strange luminosity, his glorious swirling world, and whether or not it is intended doesn’t matter. Youngblood looks past and through the floor, into something vast just like Turner looked past small human events into his version of the dangerous truth (it is no coincidence that Turner’s luminosity became ample food for the Impressionists). That murderous burst of red on Youngblood’s floor, does it even matter? The power outlet? That which is being reclaimed is, on one hand, the floor, but on another, a terrain that is much more sinister.

Youngblood’s work seems hurt somehow, fragile underneath, but there is a fundamental glow in dark places. Youngblood’s colors are muddy. Washy blacks, pulverized blues, ramshackle browns, and shy pinks want to declare dirt, the rough and ready world of assemblage and found materials. This is where the Victorville desert rat steps forward, the clenched teeth of salvage yards and afterschool boredom.  The paintings speak of memory, of the business of old sheds, woodshops presided over by tinkers and gypsy poets far from anything glossy and even farther from fashion. Youngblood’s added bits of photos and objects further shock the surfaces. However, in the gallery, these paintings are inexplicably bright, and in light of the rough materials, the luminosity is paradoxical. Untitled, 2013 (the one with the Authorized Personnel sign below) should have all the shine of a cardboard box, yet glows like creamy bars of bullion.


If one is to get a handle on this brightness, it might be best to return to the opening image of the door knob and Tree of Life. The movie’s point of view is a man coming to grips with the death of his father, who he never forgave for being somehow complicit in the death of his brother. He seeks understanding through a look at his childhood, which is bright and beautiful in his mind, a lost world of innocence and un-tethered play. Throughout the film, bits of half-remembered traumas and misunderstood events prick the surface of a blissful registry. There’s a fantastic scene where the viewer literally floats with a group of children through a field of high grass only to be jolted when a boy callously and sportingly shoots the end of another boy’s finger with a BB gun. It’s enough to set the world on edge. For Mallick as a director, beauty and love are a secular religion, they are metaphysical certainties that fold all (every malice and every turn of cruelty) paradoxically into its overwhelming mystery.

In the reality of Youngblood’s work, I find none of the pointed politics of Saar and little of John Outterbridge’s witchdoctor animism. Her sense of humor, her puns, and the unlikely metaphors that arise from pushing materials where they normally don’t go, mark a kinship with Rauschenberg.  However, a deeper, more mysterious level exists that extend past these references. There is a point where signs and symbols become frustrated, where they short circuit and get to things I doubt Youngblood can talk about but bears so casually and with enough nerve that you hope the artworld doesn’t do her harm (as it can). There is something of that metaphysical, secular religion of Mallick in these works, a bright and beautiful innocence riven through with doubt and pain, of memories laid bare and accepted.


Consider the best painting in Honor Fraser’s show, a painting that was not in the show but hung in the back: Women's Health Pack (Drive Buy), 2013 (Above).This work is nothing less than devastating. I could imagine Ellsworth Kelly looking at this work and getting the sensation of the waiting room pink rising as a form, threatening to ingest the rectangle of wallpaper at the top, Mother’s Day wrapping paper wrinkled and folded as if unable to be completely smoothed out. Get close enough and the pink is overpainted with the ghostly remains of a wheelchair.  

Again, bright pain. There is a deep, unspecific trauma here. A mother. A daughter. The rituals of giving right next to the rituals of sickness. Youngblood borrows devices from many artists: the sweeping interactions of shape and planes offered by color field painters, the blurred ghosts of history painters post-photography like Luc Tuymans and Gerhard Ritcher, and the symptomatic readymades of Mike Kelley.

However, Youngblood doesn’t make a fuss about any of these devices. She seems to simply follow a force wherever it takes her materials, in the case of Women's Health Pack (Drive Buy), the force of loss. Youngblood’s work steps to the edge of the something, where ghosts have determined how we go forward even if we don’t know it yet. It is haunting stuff. Something here reminds me of Mallick, and in closing, perhaps Marie Howe’s great poem The Gate, which I hope you’ll read.